Posts

Showing posts with the label heroin cocaine accusation

NC Court of Appeals Confirms No Duty to Retreat Prior to Self-Defense (Originally Posted by Sean Cecil Jun 07, 2017)

Image
https://edelsteinpayne.com/criminal-defense NC Court of Appeals Confirms No Duty to Retreat Prior to Self-Defense Originally Posted by Sean Cecil Jun 07, 2017 (0 Comments) North Carolina law does not require retreat before use of self-defense. "Perfect" self-defense is a defense against criminal charges; "imperfect" may be used as a mitigating factor in sentencing. Perfect self-defense requires all four of the following elements: (1) It appeared to defendant and he believed it to be necessary to use force to save himself from harm;  (2) Defendant's belief was reasonable in that the circumstances as they appeared to him at the time were sufficient to create such a belief in the mind of a person of ordinary firmness; (3) Defendant was not the aggressor in bringing on the affray, i.e., he did not aggressively and willingly enter into the fight without legal excuse or provocation; and (4) Defendant did not use excessive force.  Imperfect sel...

NC Court of Appeals re-affirms Protection of Privacy in a Home's "Curtilage" and Suppresses Marijuana (Originally Posted by Sean Cecil | Apr 19, 2017)

Image
https://edelsteinpayne.com/criminal-defense NC Court of Appeals re-affirms Protection of Privacy in a Home's "Curtilage" and Suppresses Marijuana Originally Posted by Sean Cecil | Apr 19, 2017 The Constitution had a pretty good day at the North Carolina Court of Appeals yesterday. Out of ten criminal decisions issued, four convictions were reversed; two for insufficient evidence, one for a jury instruction that was not supported by evidence during the trial, and one for an unlawful search. Notably, two of the cases involved the issue of "constructive possession", commonly used by the government to get around the pesky little issue of charging someone with a crime when they didn't  actually  possess contraband but were found near it. Actual and constructive possession were defined neatly in  State v. Billinger  (context of illegal possession of a firearm):   A person has actual possession of a firearm if it is on his person, he is aware of its...

Felony Larceny by Removing Anti-Shoplifting Device (Originally Posted by Sean Cecil Feb 12, 2016)

Image
https://edelsteinpayne.com/criminal-defense Felony Larceny by Removing Anti-Shoplifting Device Originally Posted by Sean Cecil Feb 12, 2016 (0 Comments) As I am still fairly new to the North Carolina Bar and the practice of criminal defense here in NC, I was surprised to recently be in a consultation with an individual whose petty shoplifting allegation was charged as a felony because of the additional allegation that he had removed a security device.  Shoplifting in North Carolina can be charged as a felony if the value of the goods stolen exceeds $1,000.00. It can also be a felony in some other circumstances, including if the person has four or more prior convictions for larceny.  Under North Carolina General Statute Sect. 14-72.11(2), a person is guilty of a Class H felony if the person commits larceny against a merchant "by removing, destroying, or deactivating a component of an antishoplifting or inventory control device  to prevent the activation of a...

North Carolina Criminal Law: Two Marijuana-related Convictions Reversed by Court of Appeals (Originally Posted by Sean Cecil Jan 20, 2016)

Image
www.edelsteinpayne.com/criminal-defense North Carolina Criminal Law: Two Marijuana-related Convictions Reversed by Court of Appeals Originally Posted by Sean Cecil Jan 20, 2016 (0 Comments) Criminal convictions make for difficult appeals. Whereas at trial a criminal defendant is supposed to receive the benefit of the doubt, after conviction many of those presumptions evaporate. Drug conviction appeals typically focus on 4th Amendment privacy protections, challenging convictions that were based on evidence the defendant unsuccessfully moved to suppressed because it was discovered by law enforcement only through an unconstitutional intrusion. Criminal appeals challenging the sufficiency of evidence used to convict are even more difficult- basically asking a court to overrule a finding of guilt by the jury by ruling that the evidence presented at trial was not enough to support the conviction, even when viewed in the light most favorable to the state.  This week th...