Writ of Mandamus Obtained on Behalf of Statesville Firefighter (Originally Posted by Sean Cecil Jan 11, 2016)


315 E Jones St, Raleigh, NC 27601 Edelstein & Payne Attorneys at Law Steven Edelstein Travis Payne Workers Compensation Lawyers

edelsteinpayne.com

Writ of Mandamus Obtained on Behalf of Statesville Firefighter

Originally Posted by Sean Cecil Jan 11, 2016 (0 Comments)
Last month, Edelstein Payne & Lucas partner Travis Payne and I traveled to Statesville, NC to appear in Iredell County Superior Court to petition the court for a writ of mandamus. A mandamus action in North Carolina is a petition for a court order requiring a governmental official to perform his or her non-discretionary official duties. Our client, a longtime member of the city's fire department, had applied for a promotion and underwent promotional processes. When he was not chosen for the promotion, he sought review of the decision to not promote him, as provided  in the City's Charter. He was denied a Civil Service Board review, despite several explicit requests, and was left with no choice but to petition the court for a writ of mandamus. 
There are five "elements" which must be established by a party petitioning the courts for a writ of mandamus:
  1. The party seeking relief must demonstrate a clear legal right to the act requested;
  2. The defendant must have a legal duty to perform the act requested, and the duty must be clear and not reasonably debatable;
  3. Performance of the duty-bound act must be ministerial in nature and not involve the exercise of discretion;
  4. The defendant must have neglected or refused to perform the act requested, and the time for performance must have expired; and
  5. There must be no alternative, legally adequate remedy available (the court may only issue a writ of mandamus in the absence of such a remedy).
In our case, section 5.5 of the Statesville City Charter specifically requires that the Civil Service Board "shall hear grievances as to promotions, demotions, suspensions, and terminations of members of the fire and police departments." Pretty clear. However, the City defended the petition and asserted, among other things, that there was no reviewable issue because the position our client sought was filled from outside the Department, so nobody was promoted therefore our client could not have a Civil Service Board Review. The Court did not accept that argument, and granted our petition.
One of the tragic aspects of NC mandamus law is that there is no ability that a plaintiff who successfully obtains a court-order for a government official to perform their official duties to be compensated for the attorney fees incurred. This is tragic because attorney fees add up quickly and it seems obvious that we shouldn't have to file a costly lawsuit to compel public employees to fulfill their jobs- the status quo effectively penalizes people who use the courts to enforce the law! Also, faced with the prospect of paying opposing counsel's attorney fees, government officials might be more reluctant to force these issues. 
Mandamus is an interesting issue, one that we are familiar with. We frequently represent firefighters and law enforcement officers in employment and workers' compensation litigation, and are willing to drive most of the way across the state to help individuals enforce rights such as the right to Civil Service Board review.
__________________________
If you, a co-worker, friend, neighbor, family member, or a loved one was injured on the job, please know we're here to help.  We provide complimentary case evaluations for workplace accidents any where in the state of North Carolina

For Valuable Tips, Join us, Follow and Subscribe to Edelstein Payne:

Facebook:

Twitter:

Google+

Youtube:

Blogger:

Google Places:

Instagram:

Linkedin:

Pinterest:

Tumblr:

Yelp:

YP.com:
Location: 315 E Jones St, Raleigh, NC 27601, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Felony Larceny by Removing Anti-Shoplifting Device (Originally Posted by Sean Cecil Feb 12, 2016)

Image
https://edelsteinpayne.com/criminal-defense Felony Larceny by Removing Anti-Shoplifting Device Originally Posted by Sean Cecil Feb 12, 2016 (0 Comments) As I am still fairly new to the North Carolina Bar and the practice of criminal defense here in NC, I was surprised to recently be in a consultation with an individual whose petty shoplifting allegation was charged as a felony because of the additional allegation that he had removed a security device.  Shoplifting in North Carolina can be charged as a felony if the value of the goods stolen exceeds $1,000.00. It can also be a felony in some other circumstances, including if the person has four or more prior convictions for larceny.  Under North Carolina General Statute Sect. 14-72.11(2), a person is guilty of a Class H felony if the person commits larceny against a merchant "by removing, destroying, or deactivating a component of an antishoplifting or inventory control device  to prevent the activation of any antish
Read more

2015 Federal Employment Law Update Published (Originally Posted by Sean Cecil Jun 19, 2015)

Image
www.edelsteinpayne.com 2015 Federal Employment Law Update Published Originally Posted by Sean Cecil Jun 19, 2015  (0 Comments)  We just added firm partner   Vanessa Lucas '  2015 Employment Law Update manuscript from her presentation at the recent North Carolina Advocates for Justice CLE. It contains detailed review and analysis from U.S. Supreme Court and 4th Circuit rulings over the past year, and shorter summaries of rulings from other circuits.  Detailed Summary Below: On Target Disability Rights North Carolina Champions for Equality and Justice Volume 20 • Summer 2015 2015 Summer Law Interns Bring Commitment, Build Real Life Experience We are fortunate this summer to have four dynamic law school interns volunteering to help advance critical work in our target areas. While their backgrounds vary, our interns share a common interest in their commitment to disability rights and their eagerness to make an impact outside of the law school classroom.
Read more

Home Healthcare Workers are Entitled to Overtime Pay (Originally Posted by Sean Cecil Jul 06, 2016)

Image
https://edelsteinpayne.com/employment-law Home Healthcare Workers are Entitled to Overtime Pay Originally Posted by Sean Cecil Jul 06, 2016 (0 Comments) Long the subject of a terribly unfair rule that exempted them from such standard employment rights as overtime and minimum wage, home healthcare workers are among the worst treated of American workers. Home Healthcare workers hired through a third-party staffing agency have been exempted from those rules since 1974! The Obama administration attempted to remedy this injustice in 2013, and the result has been tied up in courts until last week, when the United States Supreme Court ruled that they would not hear further appeal (the administration's rulemaking prevailed in the court of appeals) effectively ratifying the rule. Home healthcare workers, including, nurses, certified nursing assistants, physical therapists, and others who provide services to the elderly and infirm to help keep them out of nursing homes, provid
Read more